Friday, 24 June 2016

Dear Nitish Kumar, regards, a disheartened daughter of Bihar

Dear Nitishji,
I felt like writing to you for some time. But something stopped me. Perhaps I was fighting my own conscience. How do I confront the same man I campaigned for? But today, I need to break my own barriers.
I hail from Nalanda - your district. I have met you many times at cultural celebrations in the district. Recently, I worked for you as a communication consultant much against the wishes of my parents and my family. I patiently and silently celebrated the number of likes and shares and followers and retweets on your social media profiles which you so snidely derided as a mere chidiya, sometime back.
But today, like scores of other Bihari women, I feel cheated, robbed and helpless. Today I feel enraged, inflamed, hurt, helpless, extremely angry and very emotional. I am angry with myself. You might be interested in knowing why for I represent 50 per cent of your vote bank.
On June 23, a 10-year old girl was gangraped in Bihar. The very same day, a 21-year-old was raped at gunpoint and her private parts were mutilated with a pistol and wooden sticks. The suffering of the girl and the brutality of the crime led to comparisons with the Nirbhaya episode in Delhi. These might seem like one of those rare cases for an Indian state, Nitish babu. But let me take you through the incidents in this month alone.
On June 10, a man was killed for resisting and protesting the rape of his wife. On June 5, two daughters of a gangraped woman were abducted in Nawada. On June 2, a girl was raped in front of her brother at Madhaura in Bihar. On the same day, another rape was reported by a girl who was abducted and gangraped months ago. Remember, this is just half of June.
Nitishji, I was 12 years old when I was molested in a crowded bus by an adult from a specific caste. You might know which one and why I even mention the caste angle. But in this age of political correctness, let me say it for you and for my readers - because he had proudly proclaimed, "Jab Laluji gaddi par, to Yadavan ke kaahe ke dar". This was when I shouted amidst tears that I will lodge a police complaint.
My family decided when I was 14 or 15 that I should move out and I did - perhaps never to return.
But I did. I came back to work in the state for the state. My parents were happy, I was happy. You made us feel that we could lodge police complaints and that prompt action would be taken. You rebuilt that lost trust in the "system". I was thankful to you. Women across the state thanked you.
This adulation was not random and whimsical Nitishji. It was a thought over gesture built on concrete evidence and lived realities. It was a voice of your support. It was a way of telling you - keep doing the good work, we trust you completely. And you do know what I am talking about, don't you?
There was an air of threat and an air of insecurity even in the state capital, forget about districts far away from Patna, before you came to power the first time.
Even men did not feel safe in the state. We had forgotten to laugh in mirth openly. People avoided travel plans at night. Mothers were constantly praying till fathers returned from work if it was past dusk.
En masse migration of talent happened. All small and big successful businesses wound up. Professors left to teach in universities other than the state. Scenes of organised violence and fear in Gangs of Wasseypurseem normal to all of us in Bihar who grew up in the '90s, for it was normal and you do know that, don't you?
But things changed after you came in. For women like me, you fulfilled a dream. I could now have coffee in open spaces in Patna. I could roam around aimlessly, talk to strangers on the street and feel at home.
I could travel in crowded buses, fighting and conquering my inner demons. I could breathe in Bihar, Nitishji.
From a woman who had goosebumps when I moved out of the Hai Complex office for the first day at work in Patna because it was 8pm and I was never that late on Patna's streets while growing up to become a woman who confidently returned home at 3am all alone by the end of the campaign, it was a self assuring journey - both personal and political. 
But today Nitishji, that trust stands shattered. Women like me feel hurt, cheated and let me not beat around the bush, we feel molested and raped. You do know what I am talking about, don't you?
In every pre-election rally, you passionately appealed to the mothers and sisters of Bihar to vote for you. You said, "Go and vote on the election-day, first. Don't cook before you vote."
Women voted. And you also know that women stood rock solid behind you even while their own men protested your political moves. Women made you win. We trusted you. We felt we were safe and will continue to be safe till you are around.
I will share an anecdote here. I remember that in Madhubani, during the campaign, while I was staying at a friend's place, my friend's mother - a doctor married to an RSS swayamsevak, went out and voted for you much against the wishes of her husband. Do you know why? I will quote her for you: "Vote bhijua hota hai. Kya pata achha hi ho. Nitishji ne theek kaam kiya hai. Ek mauka aur deke dekhte hain."
Since, I worked with the Mahila Prakoshth of your party, Nitishji, I assume the voice of those women who might not have the advantages that I have to air their opinions in English and even in Hindi on national platforms. I assume this voice because this article is written after due consultation with more than a dozen women in your own party and more than hundreds in your state - some known very closely to you.
We all feel cheated. We feel as if we were taken for a ride. We feel as if we continue to remain your vote banks and nothing else. We fell for your raksha bandhan rhetoric in election rallies. We fell for the façade of this partial liquor ban to woo our en masse vote. Alcohol ban is a sham, Nitishji, if you could not flex your bureaucratic muscles in reining those that are more inebriated from power than by country made liquor.
Each woman who is looked at lasciviously by an emboldened man feels that your political manipulation molested her. Each teenage girl whose family decides to not let her stay in the state curses you for taking them for a ride. Each young woman entrepreneur who felt she could return and start something of her own for the state feels raped of choices in your new reign.
Nitishji, you were elected not for your social philosophy and your political revolutionary theories - Lalu fulfilled enough of that by giving the so-called voice to the voiceless. Scores of women oblivious to socialist theories voted for you because women wanted change. We wanted some peace - nothing else, for we knew that as Bihari women, we will handle everything else. We will build, rebuild, innovate, figure out, adjust and celebrate.
But you have taken us for a ride. You have cheated all of us. You have reduced us to a mere box on your checklist that you need to tick and "check" during the meticulous crafting your political strategies.
I am enraged at myself, I am livid at my stupidity and am aghast at your pretence.
A disheartened daughter of Bihar

Monday, 28 March 2016

AIUDF wanting to 'sabotage' composite culture of Assam is worrying

In its official vision statement published for public consumption on its website, the All India United Democratic  Front (AIUDF) till late on March 26 night asserted its primary vision statement - "to sabotage our millenial heritage and composite culture". The declaration of this statement needs to be deconstructed in the light of the electoral atomosphere in Assam.
Assam goes for the first phase of polls on the Apil 4, followed by the second phase on April 11.  By now, it is quite clear from the mood of the people of the state that they will choose a government which lays a roadmap for swift development. But even more important is the rather vexed question which a retired IPS officer in the state asked Home Minister Rajnath Singh during one of his official visits to Assam, "Development for whom?"
It is pertinent here to introduce a few statistics comparing the 2001 and 2011 census data for Assam:
1. In 2001, the Muslim population in Assam was 30.9 per cent. After a decade, it has risen to 34.22 per cent.
2. In 2001, there were six Muslim dominated districts in Assam. In 2011, this number has increased to nine - Barpeta, Dhubri, Karimganj, Goalpara, Darrang, Bongaigaon, Hailakandi, Nagaon and Morigaon.
3. Dhubri district has recorded the highest Muslim population of 79.67 per cent in the state, shrinking the Hindu population to 19.92 per cent.
4. The highest growth rate of Muslim population has been in Barpeta district, where it has grown at 11.73 per cent between 2001 and 2011. In this district, the Hindu population has declined to 29.10 per cent.
5. In Goalpara district, the Hindu population has remained stagnant at 34.50 per cent while the Muslim population touched 57.52 per cent.
6. Nagaon is another district where the Muslim population has grown by at least four per cent.
This statistical context is important in order to trace the root of these questions. The apprehension with respect to the development narrative of the state stems from a deep rooted psyche of regional sentiments in Assam. Some of my personal experiences involve being shocked at hearing a vegetable vendor at one instance and a cab driver in another articulate with fear and finality that Assam will be the "next Kashmir" in no less than a decade if the present condition continues unabated. When probed, all seem to refer to these hard census statistics.
In fact, it is within this deliberative framework that the last Assembly elections were fought in Assam. Chief minister Tarun Gogoi had asked, "Who is Badruddin Ajmal?" With this statement alone, he was able to consolidate those votes that till date, since the unfortunate Nellie massacre, most obviously gravitate on the borders of insomniac insecurity; that of indigenous citizens of the state losing their historical claim over Axomia Aai, that of being ousted, culturally, from their own homeland.
It is also within this framework that one needs to look at AIUDF's official website that claimed for as long as one year that articulated its vision "to sabotage our millennial heritage and composite culture". Their website was last updated in September 2015.
The vision of sabotage as articulated by AIUDF needs to be analysed as such:
1. "Sabotage" is an act of complete destruction for political and/or military intent. The question is: What does Ajmal want to sabotage? Whose culture does he mean when he uses the adjective "our"? Is it Indian, considering the ideology of his party AIDUF? Or is it Assam's culture that he wishes to destroy?
2. The Muslim question in Assam is starkly different from what it is in the rest of the country. In Assam, which is on the verge of a cultural civil war, as senior journalist Rajeev Bhattacharyya prefers to describe the situation as, the question of Muslim votes is divided into indigenous and foreign - xilonjia versus bidexi. To quote Wasbir Hussain, another senior journalist, "If you ask an Assamese Muslim man to choose between a Mumbai Muslim bride and an Assamese Hindu bride, he would choose the latter." The question, Wasbir says, is not religious in Assam but cultural. Therefore, when AIUDF says that its vision is to destroy the composite culture of Assam, it is worth a shudder down the spine of every indigenous citizen in the state.
3. The kind of clout Ajmal holds in those districts of Assam which share the porous international boundary with the state is disturbing. His vision statement is threatening. Fraught by the influx of Bangladeshi infiltrators, Assam's unique identity and history seems vulnerable and endangered. The condition invokes the legend of Lachit Borphukan's fight against the bidexis and heralds emotions only those sensitive to the nuances of Assamese culture will appreciate.
Ajmal, an MP from Dhubri, issued a clarification on March 26 lying blatantly that his official website was hacked. However, no aware citizen of India can agree to this false explanation for logical reasons:
1. A hacked website almost always has illicit content - commercial or explicit. AIUDF's website stayed untouched apart from that one defining word in their vision for the past one year. There is ample reason to believe that the act of letting this vision statement the party's priority for almost a year has been a deliberate attempt to polarise the Muslim vote base through an act of emotional appeal - almost militaristic and political in nature. Perhaps, the preparations for these Assembly elections were underway in the style of a classic articulation by Gogoi - grand understanding.
2. A hacked website does not suddenly guarantee the aggrieved user an access to its content. Ajmal's website was updated immediately when the controversy snowballed to prime time stories in Assam on electronic media.
It is to be noted that except India Today TV journalist Rahul Kanwal, no "famous" prime time journalist addressed the deep concern.
And this dear readers, is the problem with the Indian brand of secularism. I shudder at the thought of a BJP official website making a claim as grave as this - and that too at the run up to one of the most crucial Assembly elections Assam has seen post-independence.

Friday, 26 February 2016

नहीं पूरे हुए गोगोई के 94 % वादे, ऐसा कोई कारण नहीं कि ब्रह्मपुत्र और बराक में ''कमल'' न खिले


अभी हाल ही में, बिहार चुनाव के समय, मैंने श्री नीतीश कुमार जी के कैंपेन में काम किया था. उसके पहले मैंने नरेन्द्र मोदी जी के चुनाव कैंपेन में भी काम किया. खेमे बदलने की मेरी क्या वजहें थीं, उसकी विवेचना के लिए एक नए आलेख की जरुरत होगी. अपने राजनीतिक विचलन के बाद मैं अब, भारतीय जनता पार्टी के साथ औपचारिक रूप से जुड़ गयी हूँ और निर्णय लिया है कि पार्टी को मेरी सीमित बौद्धिक सेवाओं कि जहाँ जरुरत पड़े, वहां पार्टी के काम आऊंगी. मेरा यह निर्णय काफी सोच समझ कर लिया गया विचारधारात्मक और सजग निर्णय है. फिलहाल, मैं असम में काम कर रही हूँ.

अगर हम असम की बात करें, तो हमें तमाम ऐसे कारण मिलेंगे जिसकी बुनियाद पर जनता पिछले 15 वर्षों से सत्ता में रही तरुण गोगोई के नेतृत्व की कांग्रेस सरकार का सामूहिक बहिष्कार करना चाहेगी. तरुण गोगोई के 94 प्रतिशत चुनावी वादे अब तक पूरे नहीं हुए. धात्व्य हो कि असम में कुल मिलकर 55 सालों तक कांग्रेस की सरकार रही है. आइये, अब कुछ तथ्यों से रुबरु कराते हैं।

 स्वतंत्रता के समय असम देश का चतुर्थ सबसे समृद्ध प्रदेश था. आज यह देश का पंचम सबसे गरीब राज्य है. असम की एक करोड़ से अधिक जनसंख्या गरीबी रेखा के नीचे है.

 ब्रह्मपुत्र की भूमि असम प्यासी है. यहाँ 96 प्रतिशत उपजाऊ जमीन में सिंचाई की व्यवस्था उपलब्ध नहीं है. सिंचाई के मामले में इस प्रदेश की स्थिति देश के सबसे चिंतनीय मुद्दों में से एक है.

 असम के 42 प्रतिशत से अधिक लोगों के पास पीने के लिए साफ़ पानी नहीं है. एक ऐसा प्रदेश जहाँ वर्षा अच्छी है, जहाँ नदियों की कमी नहीं है, वहां इस तरह की स्थिति शर्मनाक है.

 असम में 23 लाख से अधिक पढ़े लिखे युवा बेरोजगार हैं. पपोन और जुबीन का प्रदेश, जहाँ कलाओं के क्षेत्र में युवाओं ने पूरी दुनिया में झंडे गाड़ रखे हैं, वहां तरुण गोगोई के सरकार की सबसे बड़ी विफलता इन युवाओं की ऊर्जा और उत्साह को कोई माध्यम नहीं देना रहा है. न ये युवा सम्मानजनक रोज़गार के लिए असम में कोई आशा देखते हैं और न ही किसी प्रकार से इनकी प्रतिभा और महत्वाकांक्षाओं को पंख देने के कोई साधन उपलब्ध हैं.

 असम में मातृ मृत्यु दर देश में सबसे ज्यादा है.

 पिछले एक साल में असम में महिलाओं पर 19000 से अधिक हिंसा की घटनाएँ सामने आई हैं.

 साक्षरता दर के लिहाज़ से असम देश के 23वें स्थान पर है.

 मानव विकास सूचकांक के तहत असम देश के सबसे नीचे पायदानों पर 16 वें स्थान पर खड़ा है.

 बागान श्रम अधिनियम, 1951 के अंतर्गत चाय बागान में काम करने वाले मजदूरों को अच्छा घर, साफ़ सफाई, बच्चों के लिए क्रेच, विद्यालयों, अनाज और स्वास्थ्य सम्बन्धी सुविधाएं मुहैया करवाने की बात थी. आजादी के 65 सालों बाद आज तक इस अधिनियम को पूर्णतः लागू नहीं किया जा सका है.

 असम में एक करोड़ से ज्यादा चाय बागानों के मजदूर हैं. चाय बागानों की इस तीसरी पीढ़ी को आज तक न घर मिला न कोई सुविधा. हालत ऐसी है कि कोई भी जब उनके बीच समस्याएं सुनने समझने जाए तो आँखें नम हो आयें. अगर सरकारी तंत्र के तहत मजदूरों के शोषण का अध्ययन करना हो, तो चाय बागानों के मजदूरों की अवस्थिति एक अनन्य मामला है.

 चाय बागानों में 90 प्रतिशत मजदूरों के पास माध्यमिक विद्यालयों की सुविधा नहीं है. 50 प्रतिशत के पास प्राथमिक विद्यालयों की सुविधा नहीं है.

 चाय बागानों में 80 प्रतिशत माताओं की मौत केवल इसलिए हो जाती हैं कि उनके पास स्वास्थ्य सम्बन्धी कोई सुविधा आसानी से उपलब्ध नहीं है.

 70 से 90 प्रतिशत चाय बागानों के मजदूर खतरनाक अनीमिया के शिकार हैं.

 17 प्रतिशत चाय बागाओं के मजदूर तीव्र यक्ष्मा के मरीज हैं.

 2007 और जून 2014 के मध्य चाय बागानों के बीच 9500 से ज्यादा बच्चों की तस्करी हो चुकी है.

 95 प्रतिशत चाय बागान के मजदूरों के घर में शौचालय की व्यवस्था उपलब्ध नहीं है.

 1,25,000 छोटे चाय उत्पादक बिना ज़मीन पट्टे के काम कर रहे हैं.

 चाय असम की शान है. और अगर बीबीसी की रिपोर्ट की मानें तो एक चाय बगान मजदूर बाजार में चाय की कीमत का एक प्रतिशत भी नहीं कमा पाता. अगर कांग्रेस का विरोध केवल विचारधारात्मक तरीके से सिद्धांतों और मूल्यों पर करना होता तो बात अलग थी. पर असम में पिछले 15 सालों में व्यवस्थित और संस्थागत तरीके से जो भ्रष्टाचार हुआ है, उसका प्रमाण इन दो तथ्यों से साफ़ ज़ाहिर होता है:

 2001-2002 से 2013-2014 के बीच 58 विभागों के 11834.24 करोड़ रूपए के ग्रांट्स के उपयोगिता प्रमाण पत्र अभी तक केंद्र सरकार को नहीं मिले. इतने बड़े तादात में जनता के पैसों के घालमेल के लिए स्वयं मनमोहन सरकार ने तरुण गोगोई को डांट पिलाई थी.

 आज तक 822 निरीक्षण रिपोर्ट्स जिसमें 1,80,000 करोड़ रुपये की वित्तीय अनियमितताएं हैं उन पर भी तरुण गोगोई चुप्पी साधे बैठे हैं. इन सब से इतर भारतीय जनता पार्टी के दो वर्षों से भी कम समयावधि में असम के लिए जो विशेष कार्य किये गए, उनसे यह विश्वास जगता है कि एकमात्र यही पार्टी है जिसपर भरोसा कर जनमत अपने कल्याण की जिम्मेवारी श्री सर्बानंद सोनोवाल जी जैसे मुख्य मंत्री के हाथों सौंप सकता है. केन्द्रीय सरकार ने असम के विद्युतीकरण को लेकर जो लक्ष्य तय किये थे, वे शत प्रतिशत हासिल हुए. बराक की घाटी सिलचर से नयी दिल्ली तक रेल सेवा की शुरुआत कर आजादी के 69 सालों बाद असम के इस भाग को भारतीय मुख्यधारा से जोड़ने का निर्णायक कदम उठाया गया. असम के युवा उद्यमियों के लिए 64968.51 करोड़ रुपये केंद्र से निस्त्रित कर सरकार ने सुरक्षित, विकसित और सर्वश्रेष्ठ असम की नींव रखी है.

अभी हाल ही में संपन्न हुए दक्षिण एशियाई खेलों की मेहमानवाज़ी असम को सौंप कर केन्द्रीय युवा और खेल मंत्री श्री सोनोवाल जी ने जिस सफलता पूर्वक खेल जगत में अंतर्राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर एक कीर्ति स्थापित की और असम के स्थानीय गौरव गमोसा और तिखोर, भूपेन दा के गीतों को विश्व स्तर पर सम्मानित किया, उससे उनके जातीय नायक की छवि निरंतर मुखरित हुई. यह कहना अतिशयोक्ति नहीं होगी कि श्री सर्बानंद सोनोवाल जैसे युवा, जुझारू, कर्मठ, दूरदर्शी और साफ़ छवि के नेतृत्व में असम प्रगति करेगा.

एक सजग और पढ़ी लिखी भारतीय नागरिक होने के नाते मेरा यह कर्तव्य है कि मैं अपनी शिक्षा को एक ऐसी दिशा दे पाऊं जिसके ज़रिये समाज के दबे कुचले, गरीब, हाशिये पर खड़े लोगों को उनके विकास और कल्याण में मदद मिल सके, उन्हें वे सभी सुविधाएँ बराबरी के साथ मिल सकें जिसके साथ वे अपने उत्थान की बात सोच सकें.ऐसा कोई कारण नहीं कि ब्रह्मपुत्र और बराक में कमल न खिले.

Thursday, 25 February 2016

Why I decided to be BJP's campaign manager in Assam

http://www.dailyo.in/politics/narendra-modi-assam-polls-bjp-tarun-gogoi-nitish-kumar-congress-upa-brahmaputra-act-east-policy/story/1/9222.html

I recently handled the campaign efforts for Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and prior to that, those of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's in 2013-2014. The decision as to why I chose to switch camps warrants another article. I have officially joined the BJP and have decided to work closely with the party in whichever way it finds my intellectual services useful. My decision to join the BJP is a very conscious and ideological one. I am working on my first assignment in Assam.
If we talk of Assam, there are plenty of reasons that one would want to boycott the Tarun Gogoi-led Congress government that has been ruling the state for the last 15 years. For the record, the Congress has ruled for over 55 years in the state in totality. Now, let us look at some crude facts:
1. During the British rule, Assam was one of the highest revenue-paying states in India. It was the fifth most prosperous state during independence. Today, Assam is the fourth poorest state of India. More than one crore people in the state are reeling below the poverty line.
2. More than 96 per cent agricultural land in Brahmaputra region faces water shortage. There is an acute lack of irrigation facilities - the situation is, by far, the worst in the country.
3. More than one crore, or 42 per cent, of Assam's population have no access to clean and safe drinking water. In a land surrounded by rivers and blessed with rains, such apathy is appalling.
4. More than 23 lakh youth are unemployed in Assam. The government has not just failed to nurture the innate artistic finesse of Assam, a land of singers Papon and Zubin, it failed to provide dignified employment to one of the most talented pools of the country, failed to generate job opportunities in the state and failed to give the aspirations and hope of the youth a definite shape.
5. Assam has the worst maternal mortality rate of 353 per lakh. More than 19,000 cases of violence against women have been observed in less than a year.
6. Assam ranks a lowly 23rd in the country in terms of literacy rate.
7. It ranks 16th in terms of overall human development index, which is one of the lowest in the country.
8. Plantation Labour Act, 1951, was legislated to provide basic welfare rights like proper housing, child crèches, schools, subsidised foodgrains and basic sanitation. However, even after 65 years of Congress rule, this Act hasn't been implemented in its entirety.
As a conscious and academically sound Indian citizen, I would like to believe that my education needs a certain direction to see that the actual needy, disadvantaged, poor and marginalised get the facilities and the equal rights for their welfare and development. An overall look at Assam defeats the very purpose of any debate on Gogoi's abject neglect of the people of the state who kept voting him back to power every term. 94 per cent poll promises of Gogoi's government have not been fulfilled till date.
Let us look at some other facts in this respect:
1. There are more than one crore tea plantation workers in Assam. Ever since 1952, the Congress has treated tea garden labourers as a vote bank. In return, the Congress has done nothing for the welfare of these labourers. This is the third generation of tea garden workers now that does not have a single piece of land. These workers live in abject poverty with no access to basic amenities.
2. As many as 90 per cent of Assam's tea garden workers lack access to middle school, and 50 per cent lack access to primary school.
3. Out of all maternal deaths, 80 per cent of deaths of new mothers occur in tea plantations owing to the lack of immediate access to health centres.
4. In Assam, 70-90 per cent of tea garden workers suffer from severe anaemia.
5. 17 per cent tea garden workers in Assam are suffering from acute tuberculosis.
6. Tea plantation workers are becoming prone to child trafficking. More than 9,500 children went missing from different estates between 2007 and June 2014.
7. 95 per cent of tea estate workers have no access to proper toilets in their houses.
8. Tea is a symbol of pride for the Assamese people. However, the conditions of tea estate workers are deplorable. According to a recent BBC report, a tea garden worker gets paid less than one per cent of the market tea price.
9. More than 1,25,000 small tea growers are operating without land pattas.
If it were only the issue of governance and an argument made that well, philosophically, the ruling party - the Congress in this respect - is working on an ideological plank, it could have been a different debate on principles and ethics. But when one goes through the CAG reports submitted when the UPA was at the Centre (so as to take away the blame that Modi government is going on a witch hunt), here is what you find:
1. 19,671 utilisation certificates (UCs) with respect of grants amounting to Rs 11,834.24 crore, made to 58 departments of the state government during the period from 2001-'02 to 2013-'14, have been in arrears.
2. The CAG did not get replies of 822 inspection reports for more than ten years. As a result, serious financial irregularities involving Rs 1,79,755.12 crore lay pending.
On the other side, in a move of alacrity and swift governance, the BJP at Centre has proven to stick to its commitment on the Act East policy. Right from the organisation of the South Asian Games (SAG) in Assam to 100 per cent completion of its annual targets of electrification in the hamlets, to connecting Assam within and to the national capital through train services after 69 years of Independence, to expediting the process of constructing a bridge called Bogibeel, to empowering young entrepreneurs with funds of more than Rs 64968.51 crore, the BJP has not just emerged as a credible face to salvage Assam but has indeed led by example.
There is no reason why the lotus should not bloom in the Brahmaputra and Barak.

Thursday, 21 January 2016

Mr Kejriwal, think about Dalits at home before talking on Rohith Vemula's death

Dear Mr Arvind Kejriwal,
I write to you as an ex-supporter of the Aam Admi Party and also as someone who has been closely following your politics.
I am amazed that a chief minister of some other state is flying to Hyderabad all of sudden to champion himself as a Dalit rights' activist. Scratching below the surface of your façade one sees only hypocrisy.
There has been no regularisation of safai karamcharis in Delhi. No medical insurance has been put in place for them either. As the betrayer of many a Dalit dream after you came to office, what right do you have to indulge in politics over Rohith Vemula's death when you have killed the trust that the Dalits had reposed in you? Tell me, how many times did you or your cabinet or your party even mention the cause of the Dalits all this while, since you came to office?
It is extremely hypocritical to talk about the Dalit question in Hyderabad today when you have come up with absolutely no affirmative action whatsoever when it comes to giving a fair representation to Dalits in your cabinet, party or ministries.
In fact, Rakhi Birla who was a Dalit woman in your cabinet was sacked on grounds of corruption. You did not oust her from the party solely because she consolidates your voter base, still! By exposing another hypocritical decision, Mr Kejriwal, you showcased a sly motive that reeks of political opportunism and hypocrisy. By visiting Hyderabad in this context, Mr Kejriwal, you express your shamelessness to milk Dalits and the other oppressed sections of society for your sole motive of staying and continuing in power.
No chief minister in the country has flown down to Hyderabad with the kind of limelight management as you have done. I charge you, Mr Kejriwal, for your politics of selective Dalit and/or secular and/or anti-corruption outrage. If you were a true messiah of the oppressed communities, you would have silently fulfilled the debts Rohith died under and as a genuine tribute to the Dalits, regularised the services of some of the most marginalised communities in government offices.
If you were truly secular, Mr Kejriwal, you would have spoken as strongly against the Malda violence as you took to Twitter to express your secular credentials. But perhaps you would not, because your new-found affection for West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee is driven by political arithmetic and vicious anti-Centre chemistry.
If you were a true anti-corruption activist Mr Kejriwal, you would have swiftly exposed the many files and papers against the former chief minister of Delhi, Shiela Dikshit, who suddenly seems expunged of all her sins, which when amplified, led you to the power you hold today.
No one holds you responsible, Mr Kejriwal, because you have an uncanny ability to keep media attention away from the real issues in Delhi. In your classic response to all controversies, you try to climb up the ladder of morality, easily washing away your sins, thinking the janta to be a fool who can be taken for a ride.
Dear Mr Kejriwal, as a citizen of Delhi, I am more concerned about the effects of your Tughlaqian politics like the odd-even scheme at a time when a top official of your government was under CBI scanner, than interested in knowing what you feel and express on an unfortunate incident still under investigation in Hyderabad. I want to see my leader more entrenched in visiting Nizamuddin Basti and Mehrauli slums than one who does graveyard tourism to bake his nascent political bread.
The year 2019 is quite far away, Mr Kejriwal. And after you got rejected on the national stage quite summarily, please have the humility to value what the people of Delhi have voted you for - the development and well-being of Delhi. Prove that as a leader you have the ability to make Delhi a truly secular and egalitarian space and perhaps then show the authority of your "expert" comments on events beyond the grasp of the nation at the moment.

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

Our campuses are suffering: Students must reclaim politics

Rohith's suicide has sparked nationwide outrage. Some have been hell-bent on proving his death is a case of discrimination against Dalits and few others have been trying to deconstruct it as an episode linked to a more organic flow of events going back to protests against Yakub Menon's hanging and beyond. Now that with Rahul Gandhi's visit and many other insinuations against the current government at the Centre, the death has been politicised despite Rohith's suicide note, it is high time we looked at the possibility of opening up the gates of all colleges and universities in India - whether engineering or medical or humanities or law or commerce or any other stream - to politics.
Let us look at some of the ministers at the Centre. Harsh Vardhan, Jitendra Singh, Sanjeev Kumar Balyan and Najma Heptullah have been medical students. Jayant Sinha, Manohar Parrikar, Jual Oram and Manoj Sinha are engineering graduates. When we readily accept engineers and doctors taking decisions for the larger population on key issues like price rise, tribal welfare, minority affairs, agricultural rights, etc, why do we fail to train students to ask the right political questions from when they are still in college?
Sixty five per cent of India's population is less than 35 years of age and only 53 per cent of our MPs are under the age of 55. It is extremely important, therefore, that our youth start claiming the political space right from their student days and put the right set of questions to the powers that be - beginning from their teachers, lecturers, readers and professors.
Why have Delhi University and colleges like Miranda House, which boast of inaugurating a culture of feminism in the nation through their firebrand lecturers and alumnae, inculcated no culture whatsoever of discussing the regressive "rules" of their women's hostels in classrooms, beyond the rudimentary feminist readings of curricular texts? Why do the grand old "liberal" humanities departments in varsities like DU, JNU and Jadavpur University not question and sustain protests of having more respectable representation of Dalits in their cocoons, which are almost always headed by an upper caste, upper class, Brahmin (in most cases) HoDs?
Why is there a silencing of young voices in campuses, except when there are structured and teacher-instigated protests on issues of curriculum designs and V-C selections? Why and till when should students be the pawns of a generation older to them - represented only symbolically and as mere numerical strengths - to bolster an opinion by a set of politically-motivated individuals who fester the academic atmosphere of campuses only for their own petty power climbs?
Rohith's death is unfortunate. And so are thousands of suicides that have happened in "elite" educational institutions like the IITs of this country over the past two decades. Rather than looking at Rohith's death from an angle which is most obviously casteist, can we take a step back and see why we failed to generate a culture of equality and freedom in campuses and beyond?
Why is it that students must learn political articulations only after attaching themselves to the age-old political wings of traditional political parties? Why can they not have an avenue of training in political disciplines right from the time they realise their voting rights? Why is it that a student's narrative is either dictated by the larger ideology of a couple of big political groups or a very personal narrative of incidents like suicide and self-immolation? Why do the youth not find a stronger assertion in taking the authorities hostage to their opinion rather than falling prey to the loopholes of the educational system?
Why have we never seen a Dalit engineering student inviting a similar outrage over his death as Rohith, is a question that needs a threadbare analysis. But why have we not seen Rohiths up in arms and vociferously raising their voices in campuses secluded from the mainstream academia is the larger question.

Thursday, 14 January 2016

दिल्ली थोड़ी ब्रुटल लगी: शुभ्रास्था

http://www.thepatrika.com/NewsPortal/h?cID=hdbZO0qgCHk%3D

राजधानी दिल्ली को लेकर आपने जो कल्पना की थी और पहली बार इस महानगर को देखा तो उसमें कितना फर्क था? वह फर्क क्या था?
सीधे-सीधे कहूं तो दिल्ली के बारे में यही सोच रखा था कि वह संभावनाओं से भरा शहर होगा। जब ग्रेजुएशन में दाखिला लेने पहली मर्तबा दिल्ली आई तो इसी समझ के साथ आई थी। तब दिल्ली मेरे लिए एक ऐसे प्लेटफॉर्म की तरह थी, जहां मैं अपनी बेहतरी के लिए सोच सकती थी। चूंकि इससे अधिक मैंने कोई कल्पना नहीं की थी, इसलिए जो जैसा दिखा, उसे उसी स्वरूप में जाना और समझा।
हां, जैसे-जैसे मैं इस महानगर को करीब से देखती गई तो यही जाना कि दिल्ली ऐसी जगह है, जहां कई विकल्प हैं। इन विकल्पों में हमें अपने लिए भी एक विकल्प चुनना है। ठीक उसी तरह जैसे हम किसी रेस्तरां में जाते हैं तो वहां के मेन्यू में तमाम चीजें होती हैं, जिसमें हमें अपनी पसंद के जायके चुनने होते हैं।
आप बिहार सरीखे पारंपरिक रीति-रिवाज वाले प्रदेश से दिल्ली आई थीं। यहां की जीवन-शैली से तालमेल बिठाने में आपको कितना वक्त लगाऔर इस दौरान आपने दिल्ली को किस रूप में देखा-समझा?
मैं तो यही कहूंगी कि दिल्ली थोड़ी ब्रुटल लगी। आप शहर के कितने भी संभ्रांत जगह पर क्यों न हों, लोग जज्मेंटल होकर ही देखते हैं। दिल्ली में लोगों के स्वभाव का यह हिस्सा है। इस बात को मैंने अपने ही अनुभव से समझा और जाना है। दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय के मिरांडा हाउस से मेरी पढ़ाई हुई। वहां से मैंने अंग्रेजी साहित्य में ग्रेजुएट हुई। फिर एमएम भी किया। इस तरह किसी भी छात्र-छात्राओं की तरह मैंने अपने जीवन के सबसे महत्वपूर्ण दिन दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय के नॉर्थ कैंपस में बिताए। अब तो बहुत कुछ बदल चुका है, लेकिन जब मैं पहली बार बिहार से दिल्ली आई तो मेरा पहनावा बिल्कुल अलग था। चूंकि मेरे परिवार में जींस पहनना किसी को पसंद नहीं था, तो मैं पारंपरिक आकार में सिले सूट पहनकर ही क्लास जाती थी, जिसमें दुपट्टे का विशेष महत्व था। मेरी पोशाक का आधुनिकता से दूर-दूर तक कोई नाता-रिश्ता नहीं था। तब मेरे पहनावे को लेकर छात्राओं की तो छोड़िए, कुछ टीचरों ने भी मुझे जज्मेंटल होकर देखना शुरू कर दिया था। हालांकि, वह क्षणिक ही रहा, क्योंकि जैसे-जैसे इंसान खुद को साबित करता जाता और अपनी साख बना लेता है तो बांकी चीजें पीछे छूट जाती हैं। मेरे साथ भी यही हुआ। चूंकि मैं कॉलेज पढ़ाई के लिए गई थी तो मेरी प्राथमिकता में वही रहा।
लेकिन, इसके साथ-साथ न महसूस होने वाली गति से स्वत: दूसरे बदलाव भी आते जाते हैं, जिसे हम लंबे अंतराल के बाद ही समझ पाते हैं। मसलन- एक समय दुपट्टा लेना जहां बेहद जरूरी लगता था। अब नहीं लगता है। दरअसल, ऐसी बातें इंसान के भीतर आए बदलाव को कहीं न कहीं जाहिर करती हैं। इसके बावजूद मैं कहूंगी कि दिल्ली ब्रुटल है और यह बात मुझे पसंद नहीं आई। वैसे एक समय के बाद यह समझ बनी कि कुछ बातें अच्छी न लगे, वह भी अपने-आप में जरूरी है। क्योंकि, इसके बाद ही इंसान खुद को परखने की प्रक्रिया से गुजरता है। वह अपने अंदर झांकता है। फिर यह जानने-समझने की कोशिश करता है कि उसमें ऐसी कौन सी बात है जो लोगों को अच्छी नहीं लग रही है। इस प्रक्रिया से गुजरने के बाद इंसान कुछ पुरानी चीजों को छोड़ता है और कुछ नई चीजों को ग्रहण करता है। मेरे साथ भी यही हुआ। मैंने भी कुछ चीजों को ग्रहण किया, तो कुछ को छोड़ा। कुछ चीजों से चिपकी रही, क्योंकि मैंने तय किया कि इसे किसी भी कीमत पर नहीं छोड़ना है। इस बातों के बरकस आज मैं दिल्ली को एक संतुलित मिजाज वाले शहर के रूप में देख पाती हूं, जो शायद पहले नहीं देख पाती थी।
दिल्ली के खान-पान और बोल-चाल के अंदाज को लेकर आपकी क्या राय है?
बेशक दिल्ली में लोगों की बात-चीत और उनके रहन-सहन का तरीका मुझे पहले-पहल आकर्षित नहीं करता था। मैं दिल्ली में ही यह जान पाई कि दाल भी एक तरह की सब्जी ही है। लोग रोटी-दाल मजे में खाते हैं, जबकि हमारे यहां दाल के साथ-साथ सब्जी एक जरूरी चीज है। दाल और सब्जी दोनों का अपना-अपना महत्व है। दिल्ली में दोनों का महत्व एक है। शुरू के दिनों में यह सब देखकर थोड़ा अटपटा लगता था, लेकिन अब तो कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता है। बोल-चाल को लेकर भी ऐसे ही उदाहरण हैं।

दरअसल, घर से बाहर आने के बाद जब नई-नई चीजों से सामना होता है या नई संस्कृति से मेल-जोल बढ़ता है तो कई दफा हम उसे बर्दास्त करते हुए चलते हैं। वैसे राजनीतिक परिप्रेक्ष्य से देखें तो दिल्ली आने पर हमें देश को व्यापक तरीके से जानने-समझने में मदद मिलती है। कॉलेज के दिनों में पूर्वोत्तर भारत के दोस्तों से मिलने-जुलने के दौरान यही बात ध्यान में आती थी कि इनका रंग और रिवाज विचित्र है। अब जब मैं असम में हूं तो यही सोचती हूं कि आखिर वे लोग हमारे बारे में क्या राय रखते होंगे? क्योंकि इनके लिए तो हमारा रंग-रिवाज, खान-पान सब विचित्र है। मूल रूप से उनके लिए हम विचित्र थे। खैर, मैं समझती हूं कि लोगों का अपने परिवेश के अनुसार रहन-सहन और खान-पान होता है, उसे देखकर हमें कभी भी जज्मेंटल नहीं होना चाहिए।
दिल्ली में दो तरह की संस्कृति का गहरा प्रभाव हर तरफ दिखाई देता है। एक ठेठ गंवई संस्कृति है, जो शहर के बीचों-बीच जाठ और गुर्जरों के गांव में दिखती है। जैसे- चंद्रावल गांव, ढाका, मुनिरका आदि। दूसरी संस्कृति पंजाबियता की है। आखिर वह कौन सी बात है, जो इन्हें एक दूसरे से जोड़ती भी हैक्या आपको किसी बिंदु पर दोनों संस्कृतियों के बीच टकराव होता नजर आया?
मुझे लगता है कि अर्थव्यवस्था एक ऐसी मजबूत कड़ी है जो दोनों को एक-दूसरे से जोड़े रखती है। मैं एक उदाहरण देती हूं- जिस चंद्रावल गांव का जिक्र आप कर रहे हैं, उसी गांव के लोग कमला नगर मार्केट में गोल-गप्पे और कई दूसरी चीजें बेचते हैं, जिसे शहर का पंजाबी समाज बड़े चट्कारे लेकर खाता है। यकीनन, इस दौरान दोनों का मेल-जोल होता है। यदि इससे कोई नई संस्कृतिक पनप रही होगी तो जल्दबाजी में कुछ कहना ठीक नहीं होगा। लेकिन, मोटे तौर पर मेरी यही राय है कि बदलते आर्थिक परिदृष्य में दोनों एक-दूसरे की जरूरत हैं। हां, मैं यह कह सकती हूं कि दिल्ली के चंद्रावल सरीखे गांवों से जो लड़कियां विश्वविद्यालय पढ़ाई के लिए आती हैं, वे अपनी ठेठ ग्रामीण संस्कृति के साथ-साथ पंजाबियत से भी प्रभावित होती हैं। जहां तक टकराव की बात है तो वह सांस्कृतिक स्तर पर कहीं दिखाई नहीं देता है। हालांकि, राजनीतिक टकराव जरूर है।
दिल्ली में वह कौन सी बात है जो आपको अपनी तरफ खींचती है?
अब भी मुझे यही लगता है कि दिल्ली एक संभावनाओं का शहरबना हुआ है। दिल्ली शहर की यही बात मुझे अपनी तरफ खींचती है। इसके अलावा ऐसी कोई चीज नहीं है, जिससे मैं दिल्ली की तरफ आकर्षित हो सकूं। मैं तो भारत के हर गांव में दिल्ली को पलते हुए देखना चाहती हूं ताकि लोगों को पलायन न करना पड़े। यह सच है कि पलायन से संस्कृति का मेल-जोल बढ़ रहा है, लेकिन इससे बड़ी बात तो यह होगी कि हम अपने छोटे-छोटे शहरों को भी संभावनाओं का शहर बना दें। यह आज की सबसे बड़ी जरूरत है।
असंभावनाओं के इस दौर में क्या दिल्ली से वापस लौटना संभव है?
बिल्कुल है। सच कहूं तो लोग लौट भी रहे हैं। अब मैं खुद दिल्ली में नहीं रहती। मेरी तनिक इच्छा भी नहीं है कि दिल्ली में मेरा कोई घर हो। यह सच है कि मेरे जितने सहपाठी थे, उनमें से ज्यादातर लोगों को दिल्ली पसंद आई। उन्होंने दिल्ली और मुंबई में ही रहना पसंद किया। यह निजी पसंद से जुड़ा मसला है। मेरी निजी इच्छा यही है कि अपने इलाके में जाकर कोई काम करुं। आप पाएंगे कि ज्यादातर लोग अपनी समस्याओं के निराकरण के लिए दिल्ली आते हैं। जब वे उसका समाधान ढूंढ़ लेते हैं तो उनकी महत्वाकांक्षा दिल्ली सरीखी हो जाती है और उसके साथ ही भटकाव का दौर शुरू हो जाता है। इस बात को हम ध्यान में रखेंगे तो लौटना कठिन नहीं होगा।
एक बात आपको बताना चाहूंगी। वह यह कि बिहार से जब कोई छात्र दिल्ली आता है तो वह आईएएस, पत्रकार या कोई दूसरे सपने के साथ आता है। तब उसके मन में यह बात रहती है कि पत्रकार बनकर बिहार की स्टोरी करुंगा। आईएएस बनकर बिहार कैटर लूंगा आदि-आदि। कुल मिलाकर वह अपने प्रदेश के बारे में सोचता है, लेकिन समय के साथ लुटियंस दिल्ली उसे अपनी तरफ खींच लेती है उसका लौटना मुश्किल हो जाता है। यदि हम अपने जज्बे को बनाए रखेंगे तो ‘वापस लौटना’ एक सहज प्रक्रिया होगी। वैसे भी मैं यह मानती हूं कि गांव या कस्बे को छोड़कर हम कभी आगे नहीं बढ़ते, बल्कि उसकी यादों को हमेशा साथ लिए चलते हैं।
यदि दिल्ली के किसी एक चीज को बदलने का अवसर मिले तो आप किस चीज को बदलना चाहेंगी?
यकीनन, मैं कुछ बदल पाई तो दिल्ली के प्रदूषण को खत्म करना चाहूंगी। लेकिन हां, सम-विषम वाले फार्मूले से अलग हटकर। वैसे संस्कृति के लिहाज से देखें तो मेरा यही ख्याल है कि हर शहर और प्रदेश का अपना मिजाज होता है। अगर मुझे वह रास नहीं आ रहा है, तो भी उसे बदले का हक मुझे नहीं है।
महिलाओं के लिए दिल्ली कितनी सुरक्षित है?
दिल्ली उतनी ही सुरक्षित और असुरक्षित है, जितना असम है। बिहार है। उत्तर प्रदेश आदि राज्य है। चूंकि दिल्ली राष्ट्रीय राजधानी है तो वहां घटनाएं तत्काल सामने आ जाती हैं। रिपोर्टरों के लिए उसे कवर करना आसान है तो वे उस खबर को दिखाते हैं, लेकिन ऐसा नहीं है कि केवल दिल्ली में घटनाएं हो रही हैं। यदि बारीकी से देखें तो पाएंगे कि एक लड़की के लिए जैसा पटना, लखनऊ या ऐसे दूसरे शहर हैं, वैसी ही दिल्ली है।